Editorial policy
The principles RIKAZ writes and publishes by: news kept apart from analysis, clear sourcing, and human approval.
What we commit to
- News, analysis and opinion are kept apart. Every piece shows its type (news, analysis, explainer or guide), and we do not blend facts with interpretation.
- We cite our sources. Figures and claims are tied to a source a reader can check. Where a fact can change, such as a fee, a licence status or a trading hour, we show the date it was last verified.
- We say what we know and what we do not. We do not fill gaps with guesses, and we do not present a forecast as a fact. When a fact cannot be confirmed from the sources we checked, we say so.
- No promises of profit. We do not use guaranteed-return or get-rich-quick language, and we do not give personal recommendations or buy and sell calls.
- Editorial decisions are independent of commercial interests. What we write, and how we write it, is not decided by anyone’s financial interest. See how RIKAZ makes money.
Sources
We prefer primary sources: regulator registers and warnings, official company and exchange pages, central bank and statistics-office releases, and filings. Reputable secondary sources are used when a primary source is not accessible, and are identified as such. Official links are plain links, with no referral or tracking parameters.
Approval before publication
Every piece goes through a final human editorial approval before it appears. Drafts, structured checklists and tools may support the work, but nothing is published without a person approving it. See Technology & editorial standards.
Corrections
If we get something wrong, we correct it in public. See the corrections policy.
Last updated: